I believe war should be an absolute last resort.
I like most of the world believe that there is still a strong possibility that IRAQ can be disarmed with military and economic pressure and without thousands or tens of thousands of body bags.
Until all efforts have been exhausted utilizing the international inspectors - war should not be a consideration. I believe that the 'show of force' by the U.S. is and will be sufficient to accomplish what is necessary without actually going to war -
An invasion of IRAQ especially without STRONG UN SUPPORT and without an INTERNATIONAL COALITION of FORCES will cause a huge expansion of the fundamentalist EXTREMIST ISLAMIC MOVEMENT and a universal ISLAMIC JIHAD against the western world - that from that point on all will snowball out of control -
I do not believe that Bush's motivations are the security of Americans (many many more will die both soldier and civilian following his current course of action then if he had any wisdom whatsoever) I believe his motivations are economic and with intent to strongly benefit his buddies in the global energy conglomerates.
The middle east crisis - the threat of terrorism has two causes - 1. The Palestinian/Israeli conflict 2. Poverty in the area.
He has demonstrated no leadership whatsoever in bringing the Palestinian/Israeli conflict to a satisfactory conclusion and until that issue is resolved there will be no stability in the region.
The reason that there are suicide bombers and terrorists is because the youth in the area live in abject poverty and with no hope for a future. For a small percentage of what this war is going to cost that could change - but it would require wisdom, respect for different culture and a president who does not believe that he can bully the rest of the world to do and be as he wants.
IF WE GO TO WAR WITH IRAQ WITHOUT THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY DOING EVERYTHING POSSIBLE FIRST TO ATTEMPT TO DISARM SADDAM OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION - WE WILL WIN THAT BATTLE RAPIDLY BUT I BELIEVE THAT THE WORLD WILL LOSE THE WAR THAT WILL FOLLOW AS THE ISLAMIC AND WESTERN WORLD POLARIZE THE DESTRUCTION AND HUMAN TOLL WILL EXCEED THE CASULTIES IN IRAQ X millions.
IF THAT OCCURS FUTURE HISTORY BOOKS (IF THERE ARE ANY) will hardly mention SADDAM BUT WILL UNIVERSALY CONDEMN THE BELLICOSE LEADER OF THE MOST POWERFUL COUNTRY IN THE WORLD WHOSE DESIRE TO MAKE THE WORLD (free and democratic -even as he destroys constitutional rights for American citizens in the name of security**) IN THE IMAGE HE THOUGHT IT SHOULD BE. AMERICA ONCE A LAND THE WORLD LOOKED UP TO WILL BE CONDEMNED AS ALL PREVIOUS CONTRIES HAVE BEEN THAT THOUGHT THEY COULD FORCEABLY MAKE OVER THE WORLD IN THEIR IMAGE
**Ashcrofts latest idea - Wider Power to Arrest Terror Suspects and is currently floating a draft of a bill before Congress which would circumvent the Freedom of Information Act. This would allow secret arrests of anyone the government feels like arresting without disclosing their names. Under the FOIA this is illegal. They are dubbing this Patriot Act II - "PATRIOT" ha they don't even comprehend the meaning of the word - nor what thousands of Americans died for defending.
Patriot Act?? Should be dubbed KRISTALLNACHT II
Heil Bush!!
As for North Korea - they did not become belicose until WE FAILED TO LIVE UP TO OUR OBLIGATIONS TO THEM - WE PROMISED THEM ELECTRICAL POWER THROUGH NUCLEAR PLANTS (A TYPE OF WHICH COULD NOT BE USED TO PRODUCE PLUTONIUM) THE COMPLETION DATE OF THOSE FACILITIES WERE YEARS BEYOND WHAT WAS PROMISED! FURTHERMORE WHATEVER DIALOGUE THAT EXISTED FROM THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION WAS DESTROYED AS SOON A Herr Bush decided CHILDISH NAME CALLING (axis of evil) and personalizing our differences by stating that he "loathed" Kim Jong II the leader of N. Korea.
A REAL STATESMEN OUR PRESIDENT IS HUH!
| Editorial taken from the
Los Angeles Times *bold typeface by <:)duck/ed |
FEEL FREE TO COPY OR SAVE AND PASS IT ON IF YOU WISH
SLOGANS FOR T-SHIRTS
|
|